PFAS in well water: should you test, and what removes them?
PFAS limits do not apply to private wells, so testing is up to you. Who should test, what it costs, what the federal numbers are and which filters reduce PFAS.
The short answer
PFAS are long-lasting manufactured chemicals, and no federal rule covers them in private wells: testing and treatment are up to you. The risk is low for most wells and higher near military bases, fire training sites, factories, landfills and fields spread with biosolids. A test costs about $250 to $500. If PFAS are found, use another source for drinking and cooking, or a filter certified for PFAS: activated carbon, reverse osmosis or ion exchange.
- Federal limit, PFOA and PFOS
- 4 ppt each (public systems)
- Applies to private wells
- No
- Lab test
- About $250–$500
- Filters that reduce PFAS
- Carbon, reverse osmosis, ion exchange
PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are manufactured chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products since the 1940s2. They are extremely stable and do not break down in the environment4, which is how they end up in groundwater decades after they were used.
For a well owner the starting point is this: EPA does not regulate private wells or provide recommended standards for them2. If your water comes from your own well, nobody is testing it for PFAS, and deciding whether to test is up to you.
Is your well likely to be affected?
For most wells the risk is low. Penn State Extension says PFAS in groundwater are more common near places where they were used or disposed of5:
- military bases and fire training centers
- manufacturing plants
- dumps and landfills
- fields where contaminated biosolids were spread
EPA’s list of possible sources adds fire extinguishing foam, waste sites and manufacturing waste2.
Minnesota’s health department does not recommend that every private well be tested for PFAS4. A sensible first step is the one EPA suggests: contact your state environmental or health agency for advice and for a list of certified laboratories2.
What PFAS do
The research is still developing, and the agencies choose their words carefully.
- Minnesota says higher exposure is associated with higher cholesterol, changes in liver function, reduced immune response and thyroid disease, and, for PFOA specifically, kidney and testicular cancer. It adds that more research is needed to confirm whether PFAS or other factors cause these effects4.
- EPA says that water above the federal standard does not necessarily mean health effects will occur. The risk depends on the level, on how much and how long a person is exposed, and on the individual2.
The numbers, and where they stand
In 2024 EPA set the first federal limits for PFAS in public drinking water1:
| Compound | Limit | Health goal |
|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 4.0 ppt | Zero |
| PFOS | 4.0 ppt | Zero |
| PFHxS | 10 ppt | 10 ppt |
| PFNA | 10 ppt | 10 ppt |
| HFPO-DA (“GenX”) | 10 ppt | 10 ppt |
Source: EPA. One part per trillion (ppt) is one nanogram per liter. These limits do not apply to private wells.
These are changing. On May 18, 2026, EPA announced two proposals: one keeps the limits for PFOA and PFOS and lets water systems ask for two more years, to 2031, to comply, and the other would withdraw the limits for PFHxS, PFNA and HFPO-DA1. Whatever happens to the proposals, the 4.0 ppt figures for PFOA and PFOS are the ones to compare a well result with.
Two more things to know when reading a result:
- The units are tiny. A part per trillion is a nanogram per liter. A report in micrograms per liter will show 4 ppt as 0.004 µg/L.
- States differ. Pennsylvania, for example, set its own limits of 14 ppt for PFOA and 18 ppt for PFOS5. In Canada, Health Canada’s objective is 30 ng/L for the sum of 25 PFAS6.
How to test
- Use a state-certified laboratory that runs EPA’s drinking water methods2. There are two: Method 537.1 measures 18 PFAS compounds and Method 533 measures 255.
- Budget for it. Penn State puts the cost at around $250 to $500 per sample5.
- Follow the kit instructions exactly. Labs usually send bottles with method-specific instructions for collecting, handling and shipping5.
If PFAS are found
EPA’s advice for a well with PFAS2:
- Consider another source of water for drinking, cooking, brushing teeth, preparing baby formula and anything else where water is swallowed.
- Consider a treatment system or filter certified to lower PFAS.
- Keep testing the well.
Call your state agency with the results. Minnesota, for example, has staff who help well owners interpret them4.
Filters that reduce PFAS
EPA found that three kinds of filter can greatly reduce PFAS when they are properly maintained3:
| Type | Certification to look for | Typical cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Granular activated carbon | NSF/ANSI 53 for PFAS reduction | $20 to $1,000 | |
| Ion exchange resin | NSF/ANSI 53 for PFAS reduction | $20 to $1,000 | |
| Reverse osmosis | NSF/ANSI 58 | $150 to $1,000 | Wastes about a gallon for every gallon treated |
Costs are EPA's estimates and do not include maintenance.
Types, certifications and costs are EPA’s3. Penn State describes the two ways to install them: at one tap, which avoids most exposure because most of it comes from the water you drink, or for the whole house5.
Two habits matter more than the brand:
- Change cartridges and membranes on schedule. A filter only works if it is maintained, and EPA warns that a missed replacement can increase your exposure23.
- Check the claim. Look for the standard on the packaging, then confirm it in the certifier’s listings. EPA names CSA Group, IAPMO, NSF, UL and WQA3.
Who pays
Usually you do. If the PFAS come from a Superfund site, EPA may provide a temporary alternative source of drinking water; if they come from somewhere else, the law does not allow Superfund money to be used2. EPA also says federal infrastructure funding is available to help owners of private wells address PFAS1. Your state agency is the place to ask what applies to you.
Keep the basics going
PFAS get the headlines, but the yearly tests for bacteria and nitrate are the ones every well needs. See what to test well water for, and our guides to lead and arsenic.
Questions people ask
Do I need to test my well for PFAS?
Not every well needs it. Minnesota's health department does not recommend that every private well be tested for PFAS, and Penn State Extension says the overall risk in groundwater is low. Testing makes sense if you live near a known or likely source, or if your state agency advises it for your area.
What is a safe level of PFAS in drinking water?
The federal limits for public water systems are 4.0 parts per trillion for PFOA and 4.0 for PFOS, and EPA's health goal for both is zero. Some states set their own values. None of them is enforced on a private well, but they are the numbers to compare your result with.
Do water filters remove PFAS?
Three kinds can greatly reduce PFAS when they are maintained properly, according to EPA. They are granular activated carbon, reverse osmosis and ion exchange resin. Look for certification to NSF/ANSI 53 or NSF/ANSI 58 for PFAS reduction. EPA cautions that the current certifications do not yet show a filter will reach the levels in its newest limits.
How much does a PFAS test cost?
Penn State Extension puts it at around $250 to $500 per sample, depending on the type of sample.
Should I use my well water for baby formula?
If your well has not been tested for PFAS, Minnesota's health department advises preparing infant formula with filtered tap water or bottled water. If PFAS have been found, EPA suggests an alternate source for drinking, cooking and preparing formula.
Are PFAS regulated in Canada?
Health Canada has set an objective, not a binding limit, of 30 nanograms per liter for the sum of 25 specified PFAS, and says levels should be kept as low as reasonably achievable.
Sources
We opened every source below and checked that it says what we cite it for. Numbers in the text, like 1, point to this list.
- 1 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (opens in a new tab)
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Updated May 18, 2026 · checked Oct 9, 2026
- 2 PFAS in Private Wells (opens in a new tab)
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Updated Jun 9, 2026 · checked Oct 9, 2026
- 3 Identifying Drinking Water Filters Certified to Reduce PFAS (opens in a new tab)
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Updated Nov 18, 2025 · checked Oct 9, 2026
- 4 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Private Wells (opens in a new tab)
Minnesota Department of Health · Updated Oct 21, 2024 · checked Oct 9, 2026
- 5 PFAS Drinking Water Standards, Testing, and Treatment (opens in a new tab)
Penn State Extension · Updated Jul 22, 2024 · checked Oct 9, 2026
- 6 Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality - Summary Tables (opens in a new tab)
Health Canada · Dec 2025 (page updated Jan 21, 2026) · checked Oct 9, 2026
About this guide
Researched and written by Well & Field, an independent site run by Sergio Barragán, from public health agencies, university extension services and the other sources listed above. We are not well contractors or septic installers, and this guide is not a substitute for one. First published Oct 9, 2026; last reviewed Oct 9, 2026. How we research · Report an error